Skip to content

Brought to you by

Dentons logo in black and white

Dentons Canadian Employment & Labour Law

Making the law work for your workplace.

open menu close menu

Dentons Canadian Employment & Labour Law

  • Home
  • About Us
  • Topics
    • Topics
    • Labour
    • Workplace investigations
    • Montréal Newsletter

Recent British Columbia Employment Standards Act updates further expands rights to employees relating to short-term and long-term absences

By Eleni Kassaris and Salim Visram
November 26, 2025
  • Employment Standards
Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share via email Share on LinkedIn

Restrictions on requesting sick notes in force

On November 12, 2025, Bill 11 received Royal Assent bringing into force changes to the British Columbia Employment Standards Act (BC ESA) that restricts an employer from requiring employees to provide notes from medical practitioners in certain circumstances. Where an employee requires a leave of absence that is five days or less, relates to the health, illness or an injury of the employee or a “prescribed individual,” and constitutes one of the first two such absences in the calendar year, the employer may not require the employee to provide a note from a qualified medical practitioner to substantiate the leave. If an employer does require such a note, employees are not obligated to provide one. The Employment Standards Act Regulation has yet to be updated with respect to a list of prescribed individuals to which these amendments also apply but it should be expected to consistent with the definitions of immediate family members applicable to other leaves under the BC ESA.

Importantly, Bill 11 does not eliminate an employer’s right to require employees provide “reasonably sufficient proof” to substantiate any request for a medical leave of absence. Employers are simply no longer permitted to require that a signed medical note be provided as such substantiation. Accordingly, employers should consider other documentation that may provide such reasonably sufficient proof.

Serious injury and illness leave

On October 20, 2025, the Minister of Labour introduced Bill 30, the Employment Standards (Serious Illness or Injury Leave) Amendment Act, 2025. Once enacted, employees covered by the BC ESA will be entitled to up to 27 weeks of unpaid leave within a 52 week period due to serious illness or injury. Presently, the Employment Standards Act requires employers in British Columbia to provide five days of paid leave and a further three days of unpaid leave if an employee that has been employed for at least 90 consecutive days suffers a personal illness or injury. 

This proposed amendment would entitle employees who are unable to work due to a “serious personal illness or injury” to a statutorily protected leave of absence. Bill 30 entitles employees to use this leave in units of one or more weeks, such that employees who suffer from an intermittent illness or require ongoing treatments are provided with the flexibility to work and take job-protected leave as necessary.

To access serious illness or injury leave, employees will be required to obtain a certificate from a health practitioner which states: (i) that the employee is unable to work due to medical reasons; (ii) the date that this inability began (or is anticipated to begin); and (iii) the date that the employee is expected to be able to return to work without a need for any further leave. Employees will be required to provide this certificate to their employer as soon as practicable.

Employers in British Columbia already have obligations under the Human Rights Code to accommodate employees with disabilities to the point of undue hardship and similar duties to accommodate and return individuals to work after an absence relating to workplace injury arising under the Workers Compensation Act. Bill 30, if enacted, would provide employees with a separate right under the Employment Standards Act to a job-protected leave in the event of a serious illness or injury, whether or not such illness or injury were otherwise subject to the duty to accommodate or return to work requirements as arising under these other statutes. Upon completion of this leave, employees would be entitled to be returned to their pre-leave position, or, if that position is no longer available, a position that is comparable.

For more information, please contact the authors, Eleni Kassaris and Salim Visram.

Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share via email Share on LinkedIn
Subscribe and stay updated
Receive our latest blog posts by email.
Stay in Touch
Eleni Kassaris

About Eleni Kassaris

Eleni Kassaris is a partner and leader of the Employment and Labour group in Vancouver. Drawing from over her 20 years of experience, Eleni advises employers across a wide range of industries, including technology, mining, property management, oil and gas, construction and life sciences.

All posts Full bio

Salim Visram

About Salim Visram

Salim Visram (He/Him/His) is a senior associate in the Employment & Labour group of the Dentons Vancouver office. Salim advises clients in all areas of labour and employment law, including employment contract and policies, discipline and termination, human rights and workplace accommodations, pension and administrative law, along with labour relations and occupational health and safety.

All posts Full bio

RELATED POSTS

  • Employment Standards

HR Professionals Bill Passes Second Reading

Ontario’s human resources professionals are one step closer to belonging to a true professional regulatory organization. On March 1, 2012, […]

By Andy Pushalik
  • Employment Standards

Required New ESA Poster for Ontario Workplaces

The Ontario Ministry of Labour has prepared and published a new Employment Standards Act, 2000 (“ESA”) poster entitled “Employment Standards […]

By Catherine Coulter
  • Employment Standards
  • Executive Compensation

Terminated Employee Entitled to Profit Sharing Bonus Declared After Termination but During Employment Standards Notice Period

Employers often assert that a terminated employee is not entitled to a bonus for the termination year. A decision of […]

By Adrian Miedema

About Dentons

Redefining possibilities. Together, everywhere. For more information visit dentons.com

Grow, Protect, Operate, Finance. Dentons, the law firm of the future is here. Copyright 2023 Dentons. Dentons is a global legal practice providing client services worldwide through its member firms and affiliates. Please see dentons.com for Legal notices.

Categories

  • Amendments to Safety Laws
  • Confidentiality/Trade Secrets
  • Constructive Dismissal
  • COVID-19
  • Criminal Offences by Employees
  • Employment Standards
  • Executive Compensation
  • General
  • Human Rights
  • Immigration
  • Labour
  • Montréal Newsletter
  • Occupational Health and Safety
  • Pay Equity
  • Pensions and Benefits
  • Privacy
  • Restrictive Covenants
  • Union Issues
  • Workers' Compensation
  • Workplace investigations
  • Wrongful Dismissal
  • WSIB

Subscribe and stay updated

Receive our latest blog posts by email.

Stay in Touch

Dentons logo in black and white

© 2025 Dentons

  • Legal notices
  • Privacy policy
  • Terms of use
  • Cookies on this site