Skip to content

Brought to you by

Dentons logo in black and white

Dentons Canadian Employment & Labour Law

Making the law work for your workplace.

open menu close menu

Dentons Canadian Employment & Labour Law

  • Home
  • About Us
  • Topics
    • Topics
    • Labour
    • Workplace investigations
    • Montréal Newsletter

Protecting workplace investigations with legal privilege

By Jenny Wang
November 9, 2022
  • Workplace investigations
Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share via email Share on LinkedIn

One of the benefits of hiring external legal counsel to investigate a workplace complaint is, when done properly, it may protect the investigation and resulting report from disclosure to third parties through legal privilege.

Two forms of privilege generally apply to a workplace investigation: solicitor-client privilege and litigation privilege.

Solicitor-client privilege aims to protect the relationship between a solicitor and their client. The Supreme Court of Canada has confirmed that this privilege is nearly absolute and that exceptions will be rare. However, it only applies to confidential communications between a client and their solicitor for the purpose of giving or receiving legal advice.

Litigation privilege aims to facilitate the investigation and preparation of a case for trial through the adversarial process. Therefore, it can apply even to communications of a non-confidential nature between the solicitor and third parties. However, for litigation privilege to apply, the dominant purpose for creating the document(s) must be the contemplation of actual or anticipated litigation.

To claim legal privilege over a workplace investigation, legal counsel must be retained to provide legal advice concerning the investigation. It is not enough that legal counsel is retained to investigate and report on facts. Accordingly, retainer letters with legal counsel should carefully define the role and function of the legal counsel and indicate that legal advice, in particular, is being sought with respect to the legal consequences arising from the investigation.

Further, confidentiality is essential to preserving privilege. Simply labelling the final report as “privileged and confidential” is not determinative of legal privilege protection, and privilege can be easily lost if not managed properly. Therefore, employers should develop a plan for internal communications and records relating to the investigation, determining: who has the authority to give instructions and receive advice from legal counsel; who needs to receive privileged reports or documents, for what purpose and in what format; and not sharing privilege reports and documents with external parties.

Takeaway

If an employer is seeking legal privilege over a workplace investigation and retains legal counsel to do so, it should be clear in the retainer letter that legal counsel is being retained as a legal advisor and not an investigator. Requests for advice arising from the investigation should be legal in nature (e.g., does the misconduct amount to just cause?) and not simply a conclusion on whether violations of internal policies occurred. In addition, if litigation is contemplated, it should be clearly documented. Employers should also develop a plan to protect the confidentiality of the resulting investigation report and associated documents.

If you have any questions about conducting a workplace investigation or workplace investigation training resources, or any other employment and labour questions, please reach out to Jenny Wang.

Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share via email Share on LinkedIn
Subscribe and stay updated
Receive our latest blog posts by email.
Stay in Touch
Employment and Labour
Jenny Wang

About Jenny Wang

Jenny Wang (She/Her/Hers) is an associate in Dentons’ Employment and Labour and Intellectual Property and Technology practice groups and she can provide service to clients who speak mandarin (普通话). Based in Edmonton, her developing practice includes advising clients in relation to a broad range of employment and labour matters such as employment litigation (including wrongful dismissal and constructive dismissal claims), human rights complaints, and union grievances. Among other matters, Jenny’s intellectual property practice encompasses the trademarks process and any accompanying litigation.

All posts Full bio

RELATED POSTS

  • Employment Standards
  • General
  • Occupational Health and Safety
  • Workplace investigations

Alberta Labour Relations Board clarifies prime contractor designations for multi-employer work sites where construction activities take place

By Tari Hiebert and Daniel Stachnik
  • Workplace investigations

Beyond the fun: Mitigating potential liabilities arising from employer-organized events

By Taylor Holland and Jenny Wang
  • COVID-19
  • General
  • Labour
  • Union Issues
  • Workplace investigations

To be in-person or remote at labour arbitration hearings… that is the question

By Russell Groves and Claire Browne

About Dentons

Redefining possibilities. Together, everywhere. For more information visit dentons.com

Grow, Protect, Operate, Finance. Dentons, the law firm of the future is here. Copyright 2023 Dentons. Dentons is a global legal practice providing client services worldwide through its member firms and affiliates. Please see dentons.com for Legal notices.

Categories

  • Amendments to Safety Laws
  • Confidentiality/Trade Secrets
  • Constructive Dismissal
  • COVID-19
  • Criminal Offences by Employees
  • Employment Standards
  • Executive Compensation
  • General
  • Human Rights
  • Immigration
  • Labour
  • Montréal Newsletter
  • Occupational Health and Safety
  • Pay Equity
  • Pensions and Benefits
  • Privacy
  • Restrictive Covenants
  • Union Issues
  • Workers' Compensation
  • Workplace investigations
  • Wrongful Dismissal
  • WSIB

Subscribe and stay updated

Receive our latest blog posts by email.

Stay in Touch

Dentons logo in black and white

© 2025 Dentons

  • Legal notices
  • Privacy policy
  • Terms of use
  • Cookies on this site