Skip to content

Brought to you by

Dentons logo in black and white

Dentons Canadian Employment & Labour Law

Making the law work for your workplace.

open menu close menu

Dentons Canadian Employment & Labour Law

  • Home
  • About Us
  • Topics
    • Topics
    • Labour
    • Workplace investigations
    • Montréal Newsletter

No answer yet: The Ontario Court of Appeal declines to determine whether an IDEL layoff amounts to constructive dismissal

By Catherine Coulter and Emily Kroboth
June 23, 2022
  • Constructive Dismissal
  • COVID-19
  • General
Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share via email Share on LinkedIn

Many have been anxiously awaiting the publication of Taylor v Hanley Hospitality Inc., 2022 ONCA 376 (Taylor), and the Ontario Court of Appeal’s (ONCA) ruling on whether Ontario Regulation 228/20: Infectious Disease Emergency Leave (IDEL) shields employers from common law constructive dismissal claims. However, the ONCA recently declined to comment on this very issue, instead finding that the motions judge erred in her approach to the respondent’s Rule 21 motion. Given this, the ONCA found that it was “inappropriate to rule on the issue of whether the amendments to the ESA and associated regulation affect common law rights.”

The circumstances of this case arose from the appellant employee’s placement on a temporary layoff on March 27, 2020, following the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic. The respondent employer continued to run its storefront with a reduced staff, who were not placed on layoff. As a result, the employee argued at trial that they were constructively dismissed, their layoff was unrelated to COVID-19, and it was instead “a business decision made by the [employer] in response to unfavourable economic conditions.” The employer argued that the appellant was on an infectious disease emergency leave from March 27, 2020 until September 3, 2020 when they were recalled back to work and that they were never constructively dismissed. The employee did not deliver a reply.

The respondent employer brought a Rule 21.01(1)(a) motion, under the Ontario Rules of Civil Procedure, 1990, for a determination of the issue before trial. The judge ruled that the matter was appropriate for a Rule 21 motion because it “involve[d] statutory interpretation and not matters of credibility.” The judge ultimately ruled in favour of the employer, finding that the legislative context and intent behind section 50.1 of the Employment Standards Act, 2000 and Regulation 228/20 was to limit employers’ exposure to claims of common law constructive dismissal.

However, on appeal, the ONCA found that the motions judge made several errors of law, and remitted the matter back to the Superior Court of Justice for determination. Among other things, the ONCA’s reasoning was as follows:

  • The motions judge failed to assume that the allegations in the statement of claim were true (which is required when determining a Rule 21 motion);
  • The matter involved the interpretation of both fact and law, making a Rule 21 motion inappropriate for determination of the matter;
  • The motions judge inappropriately took judicial notice of both the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the respondent’s business and the intention behind the Ontario government’s emergency measures; and
  • The motions judge did not properly apply the principles of statutory interpretation to her analysis of the Employment Standards Act, 2000 and Regulation 228/20.

Takeaway

Employers must unfortunately await a new decision from the Ontario Superior Court of Justice if this matter is, in fact, even dealt with by the Court in the future. As the COVID-19 pandemic moves into a third year, it is more than possible that Taylor may never make its way back before the Court. It should also be noted that this case has been sharply contrasted with Coutinho v. Ocular Health Centre Ltd., 2021 ONSC 3076, where the Ontario Superior Court found that employees placed on IDEL may claim constructive dismissal pursuant to the common law, and IDEL only precludes claims of constructive dismissal under the ESA. Leave to appeal in this case was not granted, meaning that the only law currently standing in relation to this issue is in favour of allowing common law constructive dismissal claims when an employee is placed on IDEL. That may remain the case unless and until Taylor is heard for a second time and a contrary decision is reached.

If you have any questions about this insight, please reach out to Catherine Coulter or Emily Kroboth.

Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share via email Share on LinkedIn
Subscribe and stay updated
Receive our latest blog posts by email.
Stay in Touch
Employment and Labour, Ontario
Catherine Coulter

About Catherine Coulter

Catherine Coulter (She/Her/Hers) practices employment and labour law as a member of the Litigation and Dispute Resolution group of Dentons’ Ottawa office. Although she principally represents and advises clients on employment and labour matters, she also acts in the fields of general commercial litigation, insurance litigation and privacy and data management.

All posts Full bio

Emily Kroboth

About Emily Kroboth

Emily Kroboth is an Associate in the Employment & Labour group at the Toronto office of Dentons Canada LLP. Emily advises clients in all areas of labour and employment law, including employment contract and policies, discipline and termination, human rights and workplace accommodations, labour relations and occupational health and safety.

All posts Full bio

RELATED POSTS

  • Constructive Dismissal
  • Employment Standards

Ontario Court Rules that ESA Temporary Layoff may still Result in Constructive Dismissal

By Matthew Curtis
  • General

National Day for Truth and Reconciliation – Is September 30 a statutory holiday for your employees?

By Emily Kroboth
  • General
  • Montréal Newsletter

Employment and Labour Montréal Newsletter – Issue 1 / March 2023

By Arianne Bouchard, Sarah-Émilie Dubois, and Camille Paradis-Loiselle

About Dentons

Redefining possibilities. Together, everywhere. For more information visit dentons.com

Grow, Protect, Operate, Finance. Dentons, the law firm of the future is here. Copyright 2023 Dentons. Dentons is a global legal practice providing client services worldwide through its member firms and affiliates. Please see dentons.com for Legal notices.

Categories

  • Amendments to Safety Laws
  • Confidentiality/Trade Secrets
  • Constructive Dismissal
  • COVID-19
  • Criminal Offences by Employees
  • Employment Standards
  • Executive Compensation
  • General
  • Human Rights
  • Immigration
  • Labour
  • Montréal Newsletter
  • Occupational Health and Safety
  • Pay Equity
  • Pensions and Benefits
  • Privacy
  • Restrictive Covenants
  • Union Issues
  • Workers' Compensation
  • Workplace investigations
  • Wrongful Dismissal
  • WSIB

Subscribe and stay updated

Receive our latest blog posts by email.

Stay in Touch

Dentons logo in black and white

© 2025 Dentons

  • Legal notices
  • Privacy policy
  • Terms of use
  • Cookies on this site